FDA Under Pressure to Relax Drug Rules

The drug industry says the antibiotic pipeline is blocked by overly stringent clinical-trial requirements for new treatments

By Heidi Ledford and Nature magazine

The FDA's Janet Woodcock. Image: Brendan Smialowski/Bloomberg/Getty

The latest skirmish in the battle between human and microbe played out on 29?November in a hotel conference room in Silver Spring, Maryland. There, an assembly of scientists and clinicians debated the merits of an experimental antibiotic. For some, the coveted prize was not just an endorsement of the drug itself, but a sign that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is finally ready to rethink its clinical-trial requirements for antibiotics ? requirements that the drug industry says are unrealistic.

The number of FDA approvals of new antibiotics has dropped even as multi-drug-resistant strains of bacteria have proliferated. FDA advisers at last week?s meeting did recommend approval of telavancin (Vibativ) ? a derivative of vanco?mycin ? for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia when alternative drugs are not suitable. But that vote came nearly two years after the FDA had rejected the drug for a second time because clinical data did not measure up to the agency?s guidelines.

?The agency has painted itself into a statistical corner,? says Scott Hopkins, chief medical officer of Rib-X, a drug company in New Haven, Connecticut, focused on antibiotics. ?While the infectious-disease community was crying out for new antibiotics, the FDA seemed to be going in the opposite direction.?

Many trace the agency?s tougher stance to the scandal surrounding telithromycin (Ketek), an antibiotic approved by the FDA in 2004 and later linked to liver failure. In 2007, the US Congress launched an investigation into whether the FDA had ignored staff concerns about Ketek?s safety. The following year, the agency convened its advisers to discuss antibiotics then under review. ?Four drugs representing over a billion dollars of investment went into that week and only one came out alive,? recalls Mark Leuchtenberger, president of Rib-X.

Telavancin was caught in the changing tides. When Theravance, the company in South San Francisco, California, that developed the drug, designed the large phase III clinical trials needed for approval, the FDA simply required a demonstration that the drug eliminated symptoms of infection as reliably as the approved antibiotic vancomycin. But, after Theravance submitted its second application on 30 June 2010, the FDA decided instead that applicants needed to show that patients were no more likely to die ? of any cause ? within 28 days of treatment with a new drug.

Theravance scrambled to gather the data, hunting down medical records for 1,419 out of the 1,503 patients scattered across dozens of countries that were enrolled in the telavancin trials. But the FDA determined that the study lacked statistical power and asked for new clinical studies. Theravance refused, and a stalemate followed.

Strict clinical guidelines for antibiotics have dogged the industry ever since, with pneumonia providing a good illustration. Patients who contract pneumonia in hospital are already ill, making it hard to know if the treatment under review played a part in their death. That means trials have to be larger to capture enough deaths to have any statistical meaning. This, combined with the relative rarity of infections that warrant the use of new antibiotics and the further FDA requirement that patients not receive other antibiotics before they get the experimental drug, has set the goal out of reach, argues David Shlaes, who runs Anti-Infectives Consulting in Stonington, Connecticut. Not a single new antibiotic for hospital-acquired pneumonia has been submitted for approval since the new guidelines were put in place. ?The trial simply cannot be done,? says Shlaes. ?Whoever was writing these guidance documents doesn?t live on the same planet that I do.?

However, since the Ketek scandal, the political winds have reversed. This summer, Congress passed a set of measures to encourage antibiotic development. In May, Janet Woodcock, head of the FDA?s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, pledged to ?reboot? the antibiotic-approval process. And in September, the FDA told Theravance that its advisers would take another look at telavancin, resulting in last week?s vote.

Source: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=9860fa242d573c730baf6a642e37d0ac

Tyrann Mathieu noaa Jessica Ridgeway jessica biel ipad mini Kevin Krim Autumn Pasquale